| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| From: | Jim Michaels <jmichae3 AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: bug in math.h |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:56:30 -0800 (PST) |
| Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines: | 17 |
| Message-ID: | <8581a32b-8100-4743-826c-f9f4f072f889@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> |
| References: | <405f577c-fbcc-4f59-9141-925f1ff95695 AT a28g2000prb DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
| <201102141848 DOT p1EImbpa028341 AT delorie DOT com> <f65c96aa-657c-4dba-acd5-89c2cc334fc6 AT z3g2000prz DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
| <201102150448 DOT p1F4mn0w020378 AT delorie DOT com> | |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 71.237.186.184 |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1297922350 30066 127.0.0.1 (17 Feb 2011 05:59:10 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:59:10 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
| Injection-Info: | i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.237.186.184; posting-account=05hOMwoAAAB6R8xtiQKzEljSMzgOhVF1 |
| User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) |
| Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) | |
| Bytes: | 2143 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
On Feb 14, 8:48=A0pm, DJ Delorie <d DOT DOT DOT AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > round() is part of TR1. and this should be part of the > > implementation of 204. > > Just because something should be in djgpp doesn't mean there are > people with the time to actually add it. =A0Would you like to volunteer > to bring DJGPP up to spec? I can't, I am not versed enough in compiler technology anymore. it's been 25 years since I've been in college taking software engineering courses. I'm rusty on a few things. I thought that GNU provided TR1 with 4.5.2 and you didn't have to re- engineer anything in the STL or TR1, you just compiled the compiler as far as that portion goes. Maybe I'm wrong. sorry. Mingw-w64 included TR1 with their 4.5.2. I just thought it was part of the gcc compiler sources.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |