Mail Archives: djgpp/2009/08/18/00:44:39
18.08.2009 01:04, Rugxulo kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> On Aug 11, 8:53 pm, Rugxulo<rugx DOT DOT DOT AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> (Below is more or less what I e-mailed the GNU Autoconf team, but they
>> annoyingly say, "Take it up with the DJGPP Bash maintainer" [which
>> IIRC is /dev/null], so I'm posting it here despite my own skepticism):
>>
>> I have tried this in various setups, on Vista, XP, even under DOSEMU.
>> So please, don't tell me I didn't give it an honest shake. :-) But
>> for some reason, ever since Reuben (rrt) upgraded to AutoConf 2.64 for
>> Zile, it just bombs out when using DJGPP Bash. Ugh, I have no idea.
>> :-/ Note that he took a look at my config.log and didn't find
>> anything (no surprise).
>
> No response from Zile or Autoconf camps, so they're probably too busy
> (or disinterested, honestly). Anyways, I did rebuild 2.05 with
> debugging info on Vista, but there is just silently exits, so symify
> was no help. Don't ask me why, but I decided to use DOSEMU here
> instead of lugging a USB stick to my XP computer.
>
> ------------
> checking for suffix of object files... o
>
DJGPP binaries of bash-2.05b does not work nice under Vista. I have
noticed that when built GCC-4.4.1. For that reason I had to use
v2.03 version of bash-2.04 to get it through. Several bugs were fixed
in DJGPP port of bash after it's first release, but it seems there are
more to be found.
Better way could be perhaps a new port of for example bash-4.0.
But that of course is if and when somebody could have time for that.
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... Exiting due to
> signal SIGSEG
>
> V
>
> General Protection Fault at eip=00026547
>
You are still lucky that You're getting backtrace. Other likely
result is that Vista complains that DOS box just crushed and You are
not even getting any backtrace.
Andris
- Raw text -