X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:44:31 +0200
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: dirent structure wrong according to online documentation
In-reply-to:	<5525a459-96b6-42b6-84ad-48aaa6eaeacd@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<ubpuccqk0.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<45698add-916e-4b28-89af-80eb795bba60 AT z27g2000prd DOT googlegroups DOT com> <200901040903 DOT n0493pTa030645 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <22e6bf83-f793-4ffc-855d-d1dad838c578 AT e1g2000pra DOT googlegroups DOT com> <u1vvhms75 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5525a459-96b6-42b6-84ad-48aaa6eaeacd AT f40g2000pri DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Jim Michaels <jmichae3 AT yahoo DOT com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:32 -0800 (PST)
> 
> > This is with DJGPP v2.03, I presume?
> >
> > Anyway, why do you need d_type so badly?
> 
> actually, I downloaded this from current, but not from CVS.

Yes, I understood that much.

> I see this structure in dirent.h:
> struct dirent {
>   char d_namlen;
>   char d_name[256];
> };

Right, but you didn't answer my question above: why do you need d_type
so badly?  What cannot be done without it?

- Raw text -