X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Jim Michaels <jmichae3 AT yahoo DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: licensing issues, modifying source code from libs
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	6
Message-ID:	<e2d2f690-fbac-4b00-b562-a68efd128ab5@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References:	<da24c689-072f-47a9-a72b-08f9d6d373b8 AT r36g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200812300446 DOT mBU4kOSf032385 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	76.115.70.155
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1230688765 17252 127.0.0.1 (31 Dec 2008 01:59:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:59:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.115.70.155;
	posting-account=05hOMwoAAAB6R8xtiQKzEljSMzgOhVF1
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5)
	Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

hmm.  now I am wondering if all my DOS prorams need to have the
licensing changed.  they don't use that modified library, but instead
#include standard djgpp libraries and use them.
does this mean that all those programs also need to be LGPL rather
than GPL due to the non-free nature of the libraries (am I getting
this right)?

- Raw text -