Mail Archives: djgpp/2008/10/10/12:01:41
Rod Pemberton wrote:
> 0) those whom I'd expect to see a response from, haven't responded
Correct. I wish Andris would care about.
> 1) you modify the installs of DJGPP for various versions of GCC most of
> which are working to your liking
Correct.
> 2) except for version numbers, gcc, cpp, cc1, libgcc.a, etc. are in the same
> directories for 4.2.3 and 4.3.2, from here:
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/dl/ofc/current/v2gnu/gcc423b.zip/
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/dl/ofc/current/v2gnu/gcc432b.zip/
Correct, except `beta' not `current'.
> 3) this implies to me that if you modify 4.3.2 the same way, it should work
> too
Correct.
> 4) some gcc for your modified installs isn't finding some cc1
Correct.
> 5) you use a modified install for 4.3.2 ("-x bin/*") which is different from
> your other working modified installs ("lib/* libexec/*")
Correct, but that's only because I also want the latest gnu/ and info/
directories.
> 6) you say you didn't install libexec for 4.3.2 ("notice the missing
Where did I say that?
> [libexec directory]..."), which I'd expect is why 4.3.2 gcc can't find 4.3.2
> cc1...
You're probably wrong here.
> 7) when asked "Where's cc1?", you say you did install libexec and therefore
> cc1 ("everything except bin")
To clarify: bin/ goes to c:\DJGPP\bin\gcc-4.2-3. Everything else goes to
the standard DJGPP directory layout.
> 8) you haven't responded to the "it's missing cc1, or cc1 is in the wrong
> directory" statement by me
Yes, it's missing cc1.exe. But because gcc.exe expects cc1.exe at the
"wrong" place.
> 9) you expect people to be familiar with "unzip" - instead of what they use:
> pkzip, winzip, 7-zip, infozip, *NIX zip
Sure, but as long as you are on Windows there shouldn't be any
difference.
> 10) you expect me to know a clean install works when you haven't stated much
> about what you tried:
Sorry, I don't understand.
> clean install
??
> what version is displayed for the gcc -v which can't find cc1
4.3.2, of course.
> "lib/* libexec/*" instead of "-x bin" for 4.3.2
??
> where 4.3.2's gcc and cc1 are versus 4.2.3's gcc and cc1
v4.3.2: c:\DJGPP\bin\gcc-4.3-2\gcc.exe
c:\DJGPP\libexec\gcc\djgpp\4.32\cc1.exe
v4.2.3: c:\DJGPP\bin\gcc-4.2-3\gcc.exe
c:\DJGPP\libexec\gcc\djgpp\4.23\cc1.exe
> if there is a difference in path's or if PATH is set incorrectly
No.
> identify why there is no libexec directory for 4.3.2
There is one. So I guess, you still didn't understand, what I do.
> if you confirmed "-x bin" does what you expect: did it install
> everything, did it overwrite everything older...
Are these questions? There are no "?".
> if renaming or moving the older directories changes the issue, i.e., no
> gcc
The older directories are not part of the problem.
Quoting myself: 'Moving GCC binaries from "bin/gcc-4.3-2/" to "bin/"
solves the problem, of course, but that's not, what I really want. ;-)'
--
Robert Riebisch
Bitte NUR in der Newsgroup antworten!
Please reply to the Newsgroup ONLY!
- Raw text -