X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:29:17 +0200
From:	Robert Riebisch <Robert DOT Riebisch AT arcor DOT de>
Organization:	none
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Building libc.a from CVS
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<484fe13e$0$27436$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date:	11 Jun 2008 16:29:18 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host:	34fb5014.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace:	DXC=?PSP4;<K7nT1`E>oC;JXEZ4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQFl8W>\BH3YRI7Mmj AT Un1nY5cYbBhlPAHWdGVbnUUgeoWoAXZ\AP9RMW_IkGM4e AT N_Z
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT arcor DOT de
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi!

I'm trying to build a fresh libc.a from CVS using djdev204, bnu217,
gcc423, gpp423, ..., but I'm having the same problem as Fabrizio in
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.msdos.djgpp/browse_thread/thread/26bada4eceaad80/1576444dc4c01983>.
Why does this still happen? His report is three years old now.

Firstly I followed his solution, but then I just copied updated
"lib/djgpp.djl" from CVS to my existing DJGPP installation. It worked
then w/o modifications. Is this the preferred way? Why does the build
process not use its own "djgpp.djl"? AFAIK LD supports "-T scriptfile"
or "--script=scriptfile".

Now I want to trace some libc functions from my main program using GDB
6.4. Currently "n" or "s" commands make no difference. GDB steps over
lstat(). So where to put the "-g" switch or some DEBUG define?

-- 
Robert Riebisch
Bitte NUR in der Newsgroup antworten!
Please reply to the Newsgroup ONLY!

- Raw text -