X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:19:15 +0100
From:	Robert Riebisch <Robert DOT Riebisch AT arcor DOT de>
Organization:	none
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: /beta/bnu217b.zip won't work in pure DOS (UPX bug??)
References:	<399e419e-7325-4a50-91c1-09d15037dc7b AT a22g2000hsc DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<47ecaff9$0$4851$9b4e6d93 AT newsspool4 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <4f07ca13-4bb0-4e50-9b59-e5017757b0a6 AT l42g2000hsc DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<47ed5839$0$4849$9b4e6d93 AT newsspool4 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <f2aa195e-ee25-44ff-8d80-abbb102ae03a AT 8g2000hse DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Lines:	34
Message-ID:	<47ed6ef7$0$23689$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Mar 2008 23:19:36 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host:	20241fd5.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace:	DXC=^>YAYcWL\Q1n`gW2MTm]<3A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR1Fl8W>\BH3Y2?i<fm]4E8S;5cYbBhlPAH7iaKhWcAC]i=@<k<B8]Zii2d:=JeN AT SD6<
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT arcor DOT de
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Rugxulo wrote:

> > That's why I have a multi-version GCC on Windows 2000. ;-) Yes, I killed
> > Ubuntu.
> 
> What for? I thought you liked it, and it worked well? What went wrong?

It hung after resume. Yes, it worked well, but Windows 2000 works better
(for me).

> > Does UPX use SSE? *g*http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/show.cgi?000372
> 
> I don't think so, but that would explain why it works in QEMU/Win32
> (which supports SSE) and not DOSBox (486DX only). AFAICT, the only way
> for GCC to use SSE is either through -msse, -mfpmath=sse, or maybe?

No idea.

> with -march=native. I can't test right now, but HDPMI32 automatically
> turns on SSE support if available, so you could try running that first
> then "as.exe --version" on your Pentium M, and see what happens.   ;-)

I don't have a working real DOS here currently.

> LZMA has been supported in UPX since 2.90 (according to their NEWS
> file). And yet /current/ was packed with 2.93 "unstable" and works
> yet /beta/ with 3.01 "stable" doesn't. Odd. I have no idea.

Just verified: Both files show method 14 ("LZMA") in their UPX header.

-- 
Robert Riebisch
Bitte NUR in der Newsgroup antworten!
Please reply to the Newsgroup ONLY!

- Raw text -