| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:08:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID: | <472A8686.4080500@zytor.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:06 -0700 |
| From: | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa AT zytor DOT com> |
| User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| CC: | Robert Riebisch <Robert DOT Riebisch AT arcor DOT de> |
| Subject: | Re: Why "upx --brute" might be a bad idea... |
| References: | <4728e78c$0$16659$9b4e6d93 AT newsspool3 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <472A847C DOT 8030008 AT zytor DOT com> |
| In-Reply-To: | <472A847C.8030008@zytor.com> |
| Lines: | 26 |
| X-Usenet-Provider: | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 67.169.144.158 |
| X-Trace: | sv3-S6VPZXdiXDYk4hfx6YIwja2PtaiTZeDB4rNalCm0DnPB8aiDBrNoG5AMBDQTlHIQcqcAUukQYoP6Sco!T/0LpF4jAmftk2ZxwzrXEGKOhiwFIHfifgma6Ku5WPyJ3jDMq8Ysl2ANXoYNSJN9zdMSbwPeJjZt!+8KWV3I= |
| X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT comcast DOT net |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To: | dmca AT comcast DOT net |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter: | 1.3.36 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Robert Riebisch wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Please read this thread at >> <http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=1220>, how UPXed >> binaries cause compile slowdowns. >> > > "upx --brute" and "upx --ultra-brute" runs a bunch of algorithms, and > picks the smallest one, which may or may not be LZMA. I don't know how > they affect decompression speed, and it would be interesting to find out. > > In particular, the NASM build robot > (ftp://ftp.zytor.com/pub/nasm/snapshots/) appear to generate marginally > smaller binaries with --[ultra-]brute than with --lzma --best, and I'm > wondering where the difference comes from. It would also be nice to > know what algorithm it ends up using so I can tell it to use the same > one every time, instead of trying them all every time taking time (a > whopping minute every night ;) > Just found upx --lzma --best --all-filters which generate the same output as --[ultra-]brute. -hpa
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |