delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:17:45 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200707261517.l6QFHjWx024140@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <46a8a21a$0$20990$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (message |
from Robert Riebisch on Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:31:06 +0200) | |
Subject: | Re: sysexits.h missing |
References: | <46a8a21a$0$20990$9b4e6d93 AT newsspool1 DOT arcor-online DOT net> |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> There's currently no `sysexits.h' in DJGPP. If BSD license is compatible > with DJGPP, why not take it from Berkeley? There's a lot of headers from other projects that we *could* include, but *should* we? What standards define the use of sysexits.h? What conventions? Why is your application using a non-standard header unconditionally? You can't just say "let's include this" without any justification. Otherwise, yes, the BSD license (assuming its the non-advertising version) is compatible with djgpp's library source tree.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |