X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:31:43 -0500
From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfru AT chat DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<f7lfo2$bql$1 AT atlantis DOT news DOT tpi DOT pl> <nIGdnfixh_KlmwLbnZ2dnUVZ_t63nZ2d AT comcast DOT com> <f7nljm$1u8$1 AT atlantis DOT news DOT tpi DOT pl> <kOqdnWuA_LS9iD7bnZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d AT comcast DOT com> <f824qq$8u$1 AT atlantis DOT news DOT tpi DOT pl>
Subject:	Re: RS232 transmission sometimes fail on AM2
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:29:30 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
Message-ID:	<DNadnYozFL9CVDnbnZ2dnUVZ_qmlnZ2d@comcast.com>
Lines:	22
X-Usenet-Provider:	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host:	67.170.73.174
X-Trace:	sv3-VQtXW4+djzqygBcd3x1zbgmrNwStJELFcJ5qWUWudvVtI/4tEH1DcBw5kpA24p14wuDYcnDISwaB80R!hubEIycwU4X2X4IjIFyRshdesHBmBV7286Xl0fyx770HoocMaE1rGKhqZuXPlNWhhkuHFjzwNnt2!wr1MPze7Qk9DVZYE//KKpwzPrQaoOw==
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT comcast DOT net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:	dmca AT comcast DOT net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter:	1.3.35
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Robbo wrote:
> Thank you very much for your answer.
>
> I spent one day long to see, what is wrong.
> As I have said earlier, there is a computer
> which communicates with special electronic device.
> The electronic device consists of a microcontroller
> and MAX202ECPE (it converts TTL to RS232).
> MAX202ECPE has different resistance of one of
> its pins that MAX232N which I had been using before.
> And it causes that it is more sensitive to any noises.
> When I replaced it back to MAX232N, everything works well.
>
> According to your suggestions about my UART code,
> thanks for them.

Quite possible, though never occurred to me. Interesting, if the chip defect 
was there already or the chip was damaged/overheated while soldering...

Cheers,
Alex

- Raw text -