delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; |
s=beta; d=gmail.com; | |
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; | |
b=gILgqvYUFD8DM0uPBhJLs1LMoCqFZLsT95g0uDWdvcML3I2gIyNY7lFNZsmWxoOYcKwgEMs/Q2ldD4JdCMV03fdtigaTOf3ge1esjTB6zB8RJ9cCvp736kf/gLOKOVkLO+Uv1u7oVslnofnZ9Vr/K5eilqaZIpePO8REHAE9Pgw= | |
Message-ID: | <7705c9030612022332l285918ehedb61a2bb4a233bc@mail.gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:32:56 -0800 |
From: | "Blair Campbell" <blairdude AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: string.h -- memccpy() prototype uses "int c, size_t n" w/o leading underscores |
In-Reply-To: | <1165113846.188039.194250@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
References: | <1165096766 DOT 030159 DOT 105280 AT f1g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
<4572251A DOT 680BFA98 AT yahoo DOT com> | |
<200612030136 DOT kB31aPZl029891 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<1165113846 DOT 188039 DOT 194250 AT j72g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
I think that most compilers accept nameless function parameters in declarations. Maybe this would be even more appropriate than using underscores? Or could someone enlighten me otherwise? On 2 Dec 2006 18:44:06 -0800, rugxulo AT gmail DOT com <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Hello, > > DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Why should it? The scope of those names is only the memccpy() > > > function. The only thing that can foul it is a previous "#define c > > > whatever" statement, etc. or a file scope declaration of c (and I > > > assume nobody would be that stupid). > > > > That's exactly what we're trying to prevent (and yes, people are that > > stupid). > > After I stumbled upon the clash (while obfuscating/shrinking the .C src > to a wimpy program of mine: went from 5k to 750 bytes or so and still > compiled), I noticed it seemed out of place to have "int c, size_t n" > when most other prototypes used underscores (e.g., "void *memchr(const > void *_s, int _c, size_t _n);"). No, not anything useful, and not even > good enough for an IOCCC entry, just me horsing around. :-P > > Feel free to keep your STRING.H unmodified if you're smart enough to > not have that problem (or work around it like I did). :-) > > P.S. "Stupid is as stupid does." -- Forrest Gump :-D > > -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |