Mail Archives: djgpp/2006/10/23/03:16:13
"Florian Xaver" <wosrediinanatour AT aon DOT at> writes:
>Then I have an "old" version. I haven't used it from CVS, I used the
>latest official release.
>Another Problem, I had no bash etc. (Compiled it unter DOS.) You are
>right...
A number of unix programs which are set up for the
automake/autoconfigure mechanism compile with minor fixes under DJGPP,
even when there is no official port. You might consider installing bash,
so that you can use configure and its associated programs.
>Have you updated the cvs source code with following patch?
I hadn't submitted the patch, since I didn't understand about the
changes you made. I compared your source to the current cvs code and saw
a number of changes, but some were just changes in cvs since the version
you were using.
>> --- sox/src/stio.c.ori 2006-05-14 16:46:56.000000000 -0800
>> +++ sox/src/stio.c 2006-10-22 21:09:54.000000000 -0800
>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>> #endif
>> /* Based from zlib's minigzip: */
>> -#if defined(WIN32) || defined(__NT__)
>> +#if defined(WIN32) || defined(__NT__) || defined(__DJGPP__)
>> # include <fcntl.h>
>> # include <io.h>
>> # define SET_BINARY_MODE(file) setmode(fileno(file), O_BINARY)
I'll submit the patch for stio.c to the sox maintainer.
Doug
--
Doug Kaufman
Internet: dkaufman AT rahul DOT net
- Raw text -