delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:05:45 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200609120005.k8C05joA018493@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <1158018482.055830.177940@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> |
(rugxulo AT gmail DOT com) | |
Subject: | Re: bloated GNU [ef]grep binaries (current/2.4 and beta/2.5.1) |
References: | <1158018482 DOT 055830 DOT 177940 AT i3g2000cwc DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Why is GNU grep (either current/2.4 or beta/2.5.1) not using "ln -s" > for fgrep, egrep binaries? Wouldn't that be smaller? I've seen > several references to that being a good idea, but in practice it > seems to not be used. Any particular reason? :-/ Most likely, it's because djgpp's ln -s is either (1) limited to executables in the same directory, or (2) newer than the grep's configury.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |