| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:38:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID: | <442A1173.5D0E7E6D@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:47:47 -0500 |
| From: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Organization: | Ched Research http://cbfalconer.home.att.net |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) |
| X-Accept-Language: | en |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: gcc 4.10 thinks it is 5x faster than 4.01 |
| References: | <1143502002 DOT 445175 DOT 231640 AT v46g2000cwv DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
| <200603272333 DOT k2RNXBhk017059 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1143539782 DOT 652312 DOT 229580 AT i39g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
| Lines: | 29 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 216.204.220.15 |
| X-Trace: | sv3-nLTh74SyiO29mNTEhDN53ck0PCqLyRfhOU6nUAAfMMVCy0mzbdzWk9w2XK8bT3oLjKc4oj6wm9luzNp!o+jM7dfJIKnFzT7wIvcfjz8b8LuYA2hU6f21mwvFtXQe3jetz+RsTbT/hqlDC3E8GV+HJmWiSg== |
| X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT arcusdigital DOT com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To: | abuse AT arcusdigital DOT com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter: | 1.3.32 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Bob W wrote: > > No, I have not changed djdev. > > 1) Deleted old 4.01 version. :-( > 2) Did a clean install via ZIP picker > 3) Compiled and ran test program > 4) Noticed the already mentioned problem > > In the meanwhile I have found out a couple > of new details. I will summarize these in > another thread: "new gcc 4.10 behaviour". Most of us haven't any idea what you are talking about, so please include context. Google is not usenet, and there is no guarantee that any reader has read, will read, or will ever receive any previous posts. So make your article stand by itself. To do this on that poor excuse for a usenet interface that google offers, see my sig below and the referenced URLs. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |