X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"Bob W" <dontsend AT operamail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: new gcc 4.10 behaviour
Date:	28 Mar 2006 11:43:29 -0800
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<1143575009.798789.145460@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References:	<1143542847 DOT 613686 DOT 87820 AT v46g2000cwv DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200603281403 DOT k2SE38fq012162 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	84.102.38.180
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1143575015 16018 127.0.0.1 (28 Mar 2006 19:43:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.102.38.180;
	posting-account=CXf2IQ0AAADhHwR4LIBYSPHMQKV3cPd3
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thanks for your hint, but I guess clock() is working fine.

The reason for some of my programs behaving now
differently seems to be a new optimisation scheme in
gcc, which is more likely to cause statements to be
executed out of sequence than in previous releases.

Otherwise gcc 4.10 looks ok to me. I just have to keep
in mind to expect the unexpected whenever my programs
depend on sequential execution of statements.

Besides that I'd like to thank you and everyone else
involved in the DJGPP project to keep it up to date
after all these years!

- Raw text -