delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | "Rod Pemberton" <dont_have AT bitbucket DOT cmm> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
References: | <1137560452 DOT 398133 DOT 301490 AT g14g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> <200601180522 DOT k0I5MCVR031756 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1137562915 DOT 964676 DOT 222680 AT f14g2000cwb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <0g31a3-vdi2 DOT ln1 AT news DOT infowest DOT com> <dqlbod$doi$1 AT rhone DOT ujf-grenoble DOT fr> <200601181556 DOT k0IFusZL016530 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Adding 64-bit file support to DJGPP |
Lines: | 21 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 |
X-IWN-Posted-By: | [68.60.59.250] Wed Jan 18 11:47:31 2006 |
Message-ID: | <23f2a3-k8s2.ln1@news.infowest.com> |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT eli DOT net |
X-Trace: | 52616e646f6d4956ab9aae61b20bf993acae1422cde01d166036f04ded8031b4ed2f07b6c7cb32c4f6630704743e93bc3a1fd35c012768ca1470ad69f7602b3da1e3c68511c32558a9d11b8ee806ef0b809c62b0f5abc0b002a417e3f2c34370a985a6c99b899a2dc6a5d3d22a5ae31f11333897c11201d9bc68bf9c191886070430e4b6e228738deac21c5331e6d69c |
X-Abuse-Info: | Please be sure to forward ALL headers so that we may process your complaint properly. |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:57:52 UTC |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:57:52 GMT |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
"DJ Delorie" <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote in message news:200601181556 DOT k0IFusZL016530 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com... > > > Rod Pemberton a écrit: > > > For personal use, I compiled a very raw but complete list of every interrupt > > > called by every function for an older version of DJGPP. DJGPP version 3.4.1 > > > > What is this version number ? just curious... > > I don't know. I'm still working on djgpp version 2.04. I'm curious. Will v2.04 use the standard GNU C library or is that out of the question? Rod
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |