delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 15 May 2005 22:29:15 +0300 |
From: | alex bodnaru <alexbodn AT 012 DOT net DOT il> |
Subject: | Re: UDP implementation? |
In-reply-to: | <slrnd8eoo3.1uo.drososa@eternity.mydomain.org> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-id: | <1116185355.12365.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Evolution 2.0.4 |
References: | <slrnd8eoo3 DOT 1uo DOT drososa AT eternity DOT mydomain DOT org> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
hi, search wattcp-32. alex On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 14:56 +0000, A. Drosos wrote: > Hi all > > I am involved in a project where we are measuring throughput between two > network devices (on powerlines). The hardware works. However, in one of the > testing modules we are using Windows XP and the copy command to transfer a > large file from one PC to another. WinXP has a large overhead here. > > Is it possible to use some UDP implementation (straight data - no error > correction whatsoever) in a DOS like op sys (the minimum possible overhead)? > I was thinking that there may already be something implemented in DJGPP. > > Any recommendations welcome. > > Tasos
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |