Mail Archives: djgpp/2005/05/09/23:17:19
Well thanks for the input guys, it would be such a waste if RHIDE was not
under active development because it's perfect for people who are used to
TurboVision TUI's. The menu's are so extensive - it must have been under
heavy development at some point. I also wish i was at the point where i
could help debug it, but only been using C for a relatively short time. I
forgot to mention i'm running Win98 and the exception that is generated is a
Divide by Zero - every time.
"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> wrote in message
news:200505092036 DOT 18799 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv...
> On Monday 09 May 2005 19:24, Larry Ziegenbein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm no expert, just a learner, but to try to help, I've had the same
>> problem with the new version within Windows 98 and also 2000. In each
>> case when I've installed it, I've found quite a few annoyances, and
>> eventually went back to using the 1.4 version. I am more familiar
>> with the bugs in that version. ;-) It is still available on the ftp
>> in the "deleted/v2apps" directory I believe.
>
> I'm using my own build of RHIDE for DJGPP. There are only very small
> differenced against current CVS version (branch for_tvision_2). As far as
> I
> remember: only support of GDB-6.3.
>
> See:
> http://sf.net/projects/rhide
> for details
>
> However it is very far from being stable and I have not put it available
> anywhere. Linux version is more stable than DJGPP one.
>
>> I'm not sure if RHIDE is really being supported wholeheartedly on the
>> Windows platform, I have looked and looked for mailinglist archives on
>> it etc, and I haven't found much. I'm not competent enough to
>> contribute yet, but I guess if I want to keep using it, I should learn
>> fast.
>
> Perhaps only minimum efforts to keep it compilable and support current GDB
> versions. That is not enough to prevent it from bitrot. So perhaps RHIDE
> is a
> dying project unless there will be more developers.
>
> Andris
- Raw text -