Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/07/09/05:15:50
>>I would like to know the official recommended/preferred DOS
>>distribution that will work best with DJGPP.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>So far, the major distributions available are:
>>- FreeDOS (Open Source)
>>- DR DOS (Commercial license from SCO for embedded use?)
>>- OpenDOS (Appears to be no longer developed and have merged with DR
>>DOS)
>>- RX DOS (Open Source)
>>- PC DOS (Commercial)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Any comment?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>---
>>Goh, Yong-Kwang
>>Singapore
>>
>>
>
>I don't know about what will work best with DJGPP, but in terms of active
>development, FreeDOS would seem to be the first choice, with no commercial
>strings. They even have an emailing list.
>
>OpenDOS was a version of DR-DOS before Caldera changed the name back to DR-DOS.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
after a few weeks of efforts to set up a djgpp environment on a new
computer, i came up to the following conclusions:
under freedos, i have experienced various i/o failures, especially with
the more advanced features, like fat32, disk caching and lfn.
under drdos, i could not use those most advanced features, but the
infrastructure seems to be more stable. extended memory support is very
limited, so i am using qemm. the command interpreter is also a little
buggy, but could be replaced by bash.
the most reliable dos version i have used with djgpp is, i have to
admit, msdos 6.22. msdos that comes with windows 95 and 98 has built in
dpmi, which does poor memory protection, as compared to cwsdpmi.
as a free software developper, i'm using drdos 7.03 on a fat16 disk, no
doslfn, , with qemm, ramdrive, but no disk cache, since nwcache, that
comes with drdos, is generating some file locating errors.
hope to be helpful,
alex
- Raw text -