X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Message-ID:	<40B1D05C.4953B12B@yahoo.com>
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Using DR-DOS fork in DJGPP
References:	<uoeok2abs DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4d201f78 DOT 0405191158 DOT 63550b51 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <7704-Wed19May2004233123+0300-eliz AT gnu DOT org> <4d201f78 DOT 0405191847 DOT 6697f90d AT posting DOT google DOT com> <u3c5vbous DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4d201f78 DOT 0405200540 DOT 307bb15a AT posting DOT google DOT com> <9743-Thu20May2004201223+0300-eliz AT gnu DOT org> <4d201f78 DOT 0405210913 DOT 26a5ffcb AT posting DOT google DOT com> <uwu33ad61 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4d201f78 DOT 0405230527 DOT 3f17fb4b AT posting DOT google DOT com> <2719-Sun23May2004185224+0300-eliz AT gnu DOT org> <f7f2b0tp6atvgj7rgqg83bo9mo2asdsndf AT 4ax DOT com> <ud64u8jcz DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Lines:	18
Date:	Mon, 24 May 2004 10:51:01 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	12.76.128.159
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace:	bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1085395861 12.76.128.159 (Mon, 24 May 2004 10:51:01 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 24 May 2004 10:51:01 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
... snip ...
> 
> Therefore, if the DR-DOS's fork doesn't handle these problems,
> there's no way we could, unless we know enough about DR-DOS
> internals to manipulate the SFT entries directly.

Even if we do, we shouldn't.  Doing so will open a never ending
can of worms.  This is much different from depending on published
interfaces.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

- Raw text -