Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/03/01/12:45:26
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:49:10 +0300 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp, "Anthony"
<akantsel AT integra DOT rmt DOT ru> wrote:
>
>"Brian Inglis" <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT Invalid> ???????/???????? ?
>???????? ?????????: news:g43540p7rivcegqhh70blsee27sm1m23if AT 4ax DOT com...
>> On 27 Feb 2004 14:09:54 -0800 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp,
>> Thomas8675309 AT yahoo DOT com (Tom) wrote:
>>
>> vim is free and works fine using DJGPP bash as its command shell and
>> DJGPP utilities to run builds, diffs, etc. I've used them daily at
>> home and work on MS Windows versions from 95 to 2K, but never had XP
>> to try them on. They're a nice set of system independent tools to
>> carry around on a CD, particularly if you also have a registry setup
>> file to make the editor the default generic/text/unknown file type
>> open action.
>
>Can you debug in vim?
vim is only an editor, which interoperates well with DJGPP and
utilities, from which you can run other utilities, especially in a
Windows environment, where each process seems to run in a separate
address space. It supports edit/compile and build, which is all I
want.
>Is there any difference if I install Vim from binaries or build it from
>sources with DJGPP?
Read the install documentation about building. I've never had a
problem with binaries from vim.org, and their MS Windows GUI version
comes with an installer that adds vim to file context menus. You can
do the same yourself with regedit but this saves work, and makes it
convenient for use on any file type.
--
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Brian DOT Inglis AT CSi DOT com (Brian dot Inglis at SystematicSw dot ab dot ca)
fake address use address above to reply
- Raw text -