| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| From: | "bdeck" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: Release 7 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1 |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:27:05 +0200 |
| Organization: | Tiscali Germany |
| Lines: | 29 |
| Message-ID: | <bjdmge$274u$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de> |
| References: | <200308312059 DOT h7VKxL613609 AT delorie DOT com> <bj4o2u$r78$1 AT ulysses DOT news DOT tiscali DOT de> <3F5791D7 DOT EB4697A5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <bjb2gk$1n54$1 AT ulysses DOT news DOT tiscali DOT de> <3F59A8A8 DOT 2B429E8A AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | p62.246.37.135.tisdip.tiscali.de |
| X-Trace: | ulysses.news.tiscali.de 1062886737 72862 62.246.37.135 (6 Sep 2003 22:18:57 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT tiscali DOT de |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:18:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
"Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> wrote in message news:3F59A8A8 DOT 2B429E8A AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk... > Hello. > > bdeck wrote: > > > > "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> wrote in message > > news:3F5791D7 DOT EB4697A5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk... > [snip] > > > Have you replaced a 2.04 alpha build of fileutils with fileutils 4.1 > > > release 7 off DJ's site (or mirrors)? fileutils 4.1 release 7 was built > > > with DJGPP 2.03 and hence doesn't support symlinks. > > > > Drat, that explains it! Maybe the next announcement should clearly explain > > which DJGPP version was to used to compile the package.. > > I think the rule is: Unless it says has been built with 2.04, you should > assume it has been built with 2.03. 2.04 is only an alpha release, after all. Whose rule is that :-)? Thanks for the info Ben
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |