Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/09/04/08:01:00
>AIKO_sex AT hotmail DOT com (mike) wrote in message news:<70f1c48a DOT 0309030117 DOT 3715b350 AT posting DOT google DOT com>...
>Does the june date's compatible with the other date packages in the
>same version dictory?(could 2.04 alpha mix to work together?or can I
>replace the gcc322b.zip with gcc33b.zip when I use djgpp2.04 without
>another packages to change with the same date satmp with the
>gcc33b.zip?)
It depends on if you are using C or C++ and if you come accross a bug
that was discovered after the alpha 1 release.
If you want to ensure that you don;t hit the bug then don't mix the
following files from alpha 1 and clio:-
djdev*.zip
gcc*b.zip
Here is the relevant part out of the GCC readme file :-
NOTE: Object files generated from C sources by gcc-3.3.1 will be
compatible with ones from earlier version, except gcc-3.2.2 where I
unfortunatelly introduced a bug, which breaked compatibility. Note
that binary archive of DJGPP v2.04 Alpha 1 is built using gcc-3.2.2,
so it's needed to rebuild it from sources, if You are going to use
this version (not needed with DJGPP v2.03 pachlevel 2, older versions
are not supported). Object files generated from C++ sources should be
compatible with ones from gcc-3.2, gcc-3.2.1, gcc-3.2.3. However I
would recommend to still use the same compilerm for all sources.
>next:i found the "cxxfilt.exe" in the djdev204b.zip,and another one
>also named "cxxfilt.exe" in the gpp322b.zip,what's about the two
>?which one I should use? I found this make me too confused.
The "cxxfilt.exe" is not in the djdev204b.zip from ftp.delorie.com or
gpp322b.zip, it's in the bnu214b.zip. Use the one from bnu214.zip
- Raw text -