| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | cbramix AT libero DOT it (Carlo) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Optimizing 8 bit variables? |
| Date: | 26 Aug 2003 05:27:43 -0700 |
| Organization: | http://groups.google.com/ |
| Lines: | 19 |
| Message-ID: | <d2ad330a.0308260427.49b6ab37@posting.google.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 151.25.158.86 |
| X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1061900865 22396 127.0.0.1 (26 Aug 2003 12:27:45 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | 26 Aug 2003 12:27:45 GMT |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hello everyone!
I have this little problem: GCC doesn't seem to optimize very well a
piece of code I wrote with 8 bit variables.
So, I was thinking to use a local register variable.
On the documentation I read that GCC can do that:
register int *foo asm ("ebx");
But what should I do if I need to use BH or BL registers?
I tried to use BH or BL instead of ebx:
register unsigned char myvar asm ("bl");
GCC doesn't give me error messages, but it generates the same code I
got without the 'asm' keyword.
Thanks in advance.
Carlo.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |