From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Weekly Mini-FAQ post for DJGPP
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2003 21:11:53 +0100
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<3EE4EA09.ADAEE255@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References:	<200306090500 DOT h59501A15161 AT delorie DOT com> <3EE47E54 DOT 5D02899 AT yahoo DOT com> <200306091511 DOT h59FBf0l013244 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3EE4D408 DOT AFB1FE7A AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	62.136.91.36
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1055190422 5796 62.136.91.36 (9 Jun 2003 20:27:02 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	9 Jun 2003 20:27:02 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

CBFalconer wrote:
[snip]
> bzip2 time, maybe?  That has the disadvantage of making individual
> content files fairly inaccessible.  It has the advantage that you
> won't have to worry about the misuse of PKUNZIP.  You might also
> consider ARJ.
[snip]

Unless there's a free ARJ maker, I don't think we should adopt ARJ. Last time
I looked only un-ARJing was free.

I like bzip2, but until djtarx from DJGPP 2.04 is widely used or more programs
like WinZip support it, I don't think we can switch to bzip2.

I think we're stuck with ZIP for a while...

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -