Date:	Sat, 17 May 2003 15:28:25 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<1438-Sat17May2003152824+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<e3d7c716.0305170158.4aa64651@posting.google.com>
	(anthony AT prairienet DOT org)
Subject:	Re: Trouble Compiling C++ with DJGPP
References:	<e3d7c716 DOT 0305161346 DOT 61886eff AT posting DOT google DOT com> <3EC5615B DOT 6000704 AT earthlink DOT net> <e3d7c716 DOT 0305170158 DOT 4aa64651 AT posting DOT google DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: anthony AT prairienet DOT org (Anthony)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 17 May 2003 02:58:15 -0700
> 
> I still wonder why I was able to
> compile the snippet in the past without the std:: though. It is an exact
> quote out of a recent book on C++.

Because the C++ standard changed, and its support in GCC changed as
well.  The version of GCC you used before was not strictly comlpiant
to the C++ standard (and so, it seems, is the book you have); the one
you use now is.

- Raw text -