From:	Andrew Cottrell <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Win2k on dual processor - help?
Date:	Wed, 09 Apr 2003 20:36:33 +1000
Organization:	ECLiPSE
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<oit79v07cu3k6mr369g4n88ktjr6c4ihv0@4ax.com>
References:	<b6v851$bgu$1 AT terabinaries DOT xmission DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	p58-tnt8.syd.ihug.com.au
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	lust.ihug.co.nz 1049884601 19611 203.173.147.58 (9 Apr 2003 10:36:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ihug DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>Everything is working great on a single processor PIII 667 running
>Win2k.  Thanx to my employer I had to put it all on a CD & run it from
>there.  But once the cd spins up, it works great.
..SNIP...
>This is my first encounter with dual-processor WinNT/2k - is there
>something inherent that antagonizes DJGPP executables?

Binaries before 1-Dec-2001 are not Win 2K or XP comaptiable and
binaroes after this date if built with the 2.03 LIBC that had fixes
for 2K/XP will be more comaptible and in 99.9% of cases work fine in
majority of cases that the average developer would use the app for.

Bash 2.04 is not Win 2K or XP compatible. I would suggest that you
have a look at the following URL and grab a copy of the 2.04 test
binaries. 
http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/win2k/main.htm

Please read the 2.04 page very carefully about mixing 2.03 and 2.04
files as there are some issues with this.

Andrew

- Raw text -