Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Anton Lavrentiev <lavr AT ncbi DOT nlm DOT nih DOT gov>
Message-Id:	<200304070413.h374DxJ25946@pavo.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>
To:	dj AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: BUG: <dos.h> missing extern "C"
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd-milter ( http://amavis.org/ )

I'm amazed how fast you replied again, thanks!
I don't think that it's now a problem either,
but without extern "C" in place an idea of someone
deriving classes based on those stuctures comes real...
That's just a comment.


--- Original message ---
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:44:34 -0400
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: lavr AT ncbi DOT nlm DOT nih DOT gov
Subject: Re: BUG: <dos.h> missing extern "C"

> Thanks for the prompt reply. There is indeed a
> fix in CVS, but it doesn't look complete:
> extern "C" comes after some structures been
> declared, effectively making them real "classes"
> in C++ code...

In gcc, that's not a problem.

- Raw text -