Message-ID:	<20030318172804.60799.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:28:04 -0800 (PST)
From:	Thomas Tutone <thomas8675309 AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: gpp -pg : cannot find -lstdc++
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il
In-Reply-To:	<4634-Tue18Mar2003081847+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--- Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > cpp is the
> > preprocessor, not gpp.  I have no idea why gpp
> > didn't
> > work, but I do know that gxx works fine.
> 
> Probably because of a bug in the ported gpp, which
> only shows up when
> linking with -pg (it should look for -lstdcxx, not
> -lstdc++).  You
> could work around this by using "gcc" and manually
> adding C++
> libraries on the link command line.

Thanks, Eli - I thought it was something like that. 
But that leaves open the question of what the
difference is between gxx.exe and gpp.exe.  I had
understood - mistakenly, I guess - that they were
equivalent.  But the OP's example shows this is not
the case - adding the -pg command line argument causes
a diagnostic with gpp.exe, but not gxx.exe.  And when
I look in my bin directory, gxx.exe has a
last-modified date of 12/24/2001 and a size of 81K,
while gpp.exe has a last-modified date of 11/27/2002
and a size of 160K.  So they are clearly not the same.
 Is gxx.exe an artifact of an earlier version of djgpp
that never got updated?  Or is there a more basic
difference between the gpp.exe and gxx.exe that I
should be aware of?  (I'm using gcc version 3.21, and
did a new clean install of the latest versions of
everything in djgpp in December after deleting my
then-existing install in its entirety.)

Can someone enlighten me?

Best regards,

Tom

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

- Raw text -