Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:57:25 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<8582-Tue18Mar2003095725+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<b56jec$8n5$1@narses.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> (message from
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= on 18 Mar 2003 07:55:56 GMT)
Subject:	Re: gcc -O3 & gprof
References:	<b54db9$252aq3$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <Oejda.183$Zf2 DOT 42 AT read3 DOT inet DOT fi> <b568o6$258tun$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <b56jec$8n5$1 AT narses DOT hrz DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= <poenitz AT gmx DOT net>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,gnu.gcc.help,gnu.utils.help
> Date: 18 Mar 2003 07:55:56 GMT
> 
> > For instance, nm doesn't distinguish -O0, -O1, -O2, -O3.
> 
> The function definitions have to be there in case you want to access them
> from another translation unit.

I think the symbols are there also if some code, even in the same
translation unit, needs to call one of these functions via a pointer.

- Raw text -