From:	"Tauno Voipio" <tauno DOT voipio AT iki DOT fi DOT SPAMBAIT_REMOVE DOT invalid>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,gnu.gcc.help,gnu.utils.help
References:	<b54db9$252aq3$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
Subject:	Re: gcc -O3 & gprof
Lines:	33
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID:	<Oejda.183$Zf2.42@read3.inet.fi>
Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:31:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	80.222.87.113
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT inet DOT fi
X-Trace:	read3.inet.fi 1047904302 80.222.87.113 (Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:31:42 EET)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:31:42 EET
Organization:	Sonera corp Internet services
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT bigfoot DOT com> wrote in message
news:b54db9$252aq3$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de...
> =====================
> Windows 2000
> DJGPP 2.03
> GNU gcc version 3.2.1
> GNU gprof 2.13
> =====================
>
>
> Here is a simple program that has been profiled with using gprof.
> We can see that if the program is compiled with option -O3
>  then gprof's output doesn't contained called functions foo1() and foo2().
>
> Any explanation ?
>
>
> ========= C code : BEGIN =========
> /* File main.c */
>
> int foo1 (int argc) { return argc; }
> int foo2 (int argc) { return argc; }

The optimisation -O3 inlines simple functions (like yours here). There are
no calls to trace.

HTH

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio @ iki fi

- Raw text -