From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Compiling GRX 245
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:07:05 +0200
User-Agent:	KMail/1.5
References:	<002101c2e3fc$181e0700$0300a8c0 AT rivasaiicfa DOT com DOT ar> <200303101412 DOT 54939 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200303101237 DOT h2ACbCM16536 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<200303101237.h2ACbCM16536@envy.delorie.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<200303101607.06004.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Monday 10 March 2003 14:37, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Also. I completely agree that it would perhaps be better to name updated
> > version as 2.04 and perhaps the next version as 2.10
>
> 2.10?  What happened to 2.05 through 2.09?

Maybe it could be nice to bump 2nd digit on major updates and leave the lower 
one for smaller moustly bugfix ones (like the need to updated djdev203.zip to 
get it compatible with new GCC versions). I think current CVS version has 
enough new features to be treated as major update.

Andris

- Raw text -