From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: RHIDE 1.5
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:08:09 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston TX
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<3e52cae9.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<dP72a.45469$jM5 DOT 114036 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <3e491127 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E529A14 DOT 7F493AF5 AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
X-Trace:	joe.rice.edu 1045613309 8905 128.42.105.3 (19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT
X-NewsEditor:	ED-1.5.9
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> > Unless you are using an entire CVS/test system from Andrew's build,
> > you already have mixed version binaries.

> No, what I mean is I am using gcc 3.2.1 here, so the new release
> of rhide would generate different binaries, have less C99
> abilities, confuse me even more, etc.

Since RHIDE calls the compiler (gcc 3.2.1), it would generate the 
exact same binaries.  I can't help about the confusion :-)

- Raw text -