delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: RHIDE 1.5 |
Date: | Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:08:09 CST |
Organization: | Rice University, Houston TX |
Lines: | 10 |
Message-ID: | <3e52cae9.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
References: | <dP72a.45469$jM5 DOT 114036 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <3e491127 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E529A14 DOT 7F493AF5 AT yahoo DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | clio.rice.edu |
X-Trace: | joe.rice.edu 1045613309 8905 128.42.105.3 (19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT rice DOT edu |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT |
X-NewsEditor: | ED-1.5.9 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> > Unless you are using an entire CVS/test system from Andrew's build, > > you already have mixed version binaries. > No, what I mean is I am using gcc 3.2.1 here, so the new release > of rhide would generate different binaries, have less C99 > abilities, confuse me even more, etc. Since RHIDE calls the compiler (gcc 3.2.1), it would generate the exact same binaries. I can't help about the confusion :-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |