Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/02/18/18:45:16
Charles Sandmann wrote:
> CBFalconer wrote:
> > Robert Hoehne wrote:
> > > CBFalconer schrieb:
>
> > > The main differences are, that I have built it using gcc 2.95.3
> > > and using gdb 5.3.
>
> > > I used gcc 2.95.3, because the built with gcc 3.2 was very unstable
> > > (probably, because the core DJGPP was not bult with gcc 3.2).
>
> > However my main system, for gpc and gcc, is gcc 3.2.1. and gdb
> > 5.3. So I probably should not confuse things by backtracking.
>
> The GCC version the application was built with should not matter.
> V2.03 (and refresh) were built with GCC 2.8.1, many of the Simtel
> binaries (like make) were built with GCC 2.7.x, 2.8.x or 2.9.x
>
> Unless you are using an entire CVS/test system from Andrew's build,
> you already have mixed version binaries.
No, what I mean is I am using gcc 3.2.1 here, so the new release
of rhide would generate different binaries, have less C99
abilities, confuse me even more, etc.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Raw text -