delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Scott J. McCaughrin" <sjmccaug AT bluestem DOT prairienet DOT org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Generate real-mode 386 DOS executables? |
Date: | Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:28:30 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | CNI/Prairienet |
Lines: | 16 |
Message-ID: | <b23b7e$bjk$1@wildfire.prairienet.org> |
References: | <BQ2S9.280216$a8 DOT 123208 AT news4 DOT srv DOT hcvlny DOT cv DOT net> <3pii1vkro878ujd0dlsa95mqgudtp86lvs AT 4ax DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | bluestem.prairienet.org |
X-Trace: | wildfire.prairienet.org 1044721710 11892 192.17.3.4 (8 Feb 2003 16:28:30 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | newsmgr AT prairienet DOT org |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:28:30 +0000 (UTC) |
User-Agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.8 (sun4u)) |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Andrew Cottrell <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au> wrote: : On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 23:02:57 GMT, Spam Averse <nobody AT spamcop DOT net> >I : have a project that is currently built with Borland's Turbo C/C++ : v3.0. :>(For you youngsters, this circa 1992 compiler generates 16-bit DOS :>executables for the 86/186/286 CPUs.) The code is run on a Pentium-based :>embedded system under MS-DOS v6.22. Not only does this compiler not :>generate 32-bit code, but the code that it does generate is terribly :>inefficient. I'm considering DJGPP as a replacement for the Turbo C/C++ :>compiler. The question remains: is DJGPP really for MS-DOS? If so, then I should be able to make 16-bit INT 21h DOS function calls. If I cannot make such calls, it is really not DOS-compliant. So which is it?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |