delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Question re IRET wrapper and rdtsc |
Date: | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:47:55 CST |
Organization: | Rice University, Houston TX |
Lines: | 11 |
Message-ID: | <3dd9a65b.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
References: | <a1babb92 DOT 0211181535 DOT 480d34e2 AT posting DOT google DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | clio.rice.edu |
X-Trace: | joe.rice.edu 1037674266 19929 128.42.105.3 (19 Nov 2002 02:51:06 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT rice DOT edu |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 19 Nov 2002 02:51:06 GMT |
X-NewsEditor: | ED-1.5.9 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> 1. I am using _go32_dpmi_allocate_iret_wrapper and family to install > the handler (see code below). Does my handler need the commonly-used > cli/pusha preamble (and accompanying popa/sti), or does the wrapper > code do this for me? I have been unable to decipher the djgpp source, > and there seems to be conflicting advice out there. Do not use cli/sti with the wrappers. If there is any advice which says they should be used, let us know so we can fix it. pusha/popa are not needed; they are done in the wrapper.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |