From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: cleaning source from warnings troubles
Date:	29 Sep 2002 22:27:10 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<an7unu$eao$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<e8982227 DOT 0209230144 DOT 2d26793e AT posting DOT google DOT com> <ammsir$l1m$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <e8982227 DOT 0209270013 DOT 38800e2f AT posting DOT google DOT com> <an16kp$mgq$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <e8982227 DOT 0209280120 DOT 10210faa AT posting DOT google DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1033338430 14680 137.226.32.75 (29 Sep 2002 22:27:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 Sep 2002 22:27:10 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba <abx AT abx DOT art DOT pl> wrote:

[...]
> ... not works. Or rather works where it is applied - in enum there is
> no more warning. But in case statement where entries from enum are
> used there is error that tokens from enum have the same value. Any
> idea ?

This is really a rather heavy change to the program itself.  Unless
you're an active POV coder yourself, or at least have tools to quick
find and edit all places where this unportably defined enum is used, I
strongly suggest you pass this buck to them.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -