Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/09/19/08:00:02
Kim Seng <Query AT singnet DOT com DOT sg> wrote:
>> That's clear indication that this code is indeed assuming an
>> old-fashioned, no longer correct version of the C++ language.
> mmh, does that I'm on the wrong track. A bit confused now on which one is
> the standard.
> #include <iostream>
> using namespace std;
That's the new, officially standardized way. But to work around your
naming conflicts regarding the variable "count", it might be better to
avoid "using namespace std;" and instead salt your code with explicit
"std::" prefixes where necessary.
> #include <iostream.h>
That's the older way. As of version 3.0 and later, GCC will complain
about this, warning you about "deprecated usage".
>> The one by Stroustrup should be up to date, e.g.
> Do you have any good book to introduce to this newbie? :p
No, because I don't actively do C++ myself, but if I did, I'd be using
"the real thing", i.e. Stroustrup.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
- Raw text -