Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/09/12/08:30:10
Richard Dawe wrote:
> [snip]
> One solution to this problem is to write DSMs for all the legacy packages and
> put them in a package, e.g.: djgpp-legacy-dsms. pakke actually comes with DSMs
> for some legacy packages.
I wasn't aware of that. I'm rebuilding the package list by using also
data from these dsms. In doing so, I've collected the present status of
dms availability:
Folder Listed Internal-dsm External-dsm With-dsm
Without-dsm
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
------------ -------- ------------ ------------ --------
-----------
v2 20 9 6 15 5
v2apps 82 14 8 22 60
v2apps/tex 38 2 36 38 0
v2gnu 308 141 45 186 122
v2misc 35 4 5 9 26
v2tk 108 12 4 16 92
v2tk/allegro 36 0 0 0 36
Total 627 182 104 286 341
(46%) (54%)
(1) Listed in 00_index.txt
(2) The .zip archive contains a dsm file
(3) No dsm inside .zip, but there is one in pakke database
(4) = (2) + (3)
(5) = (1) - (4)
Roughly, half the package archives already have dsms, and figures are
better if we consider only the most recent version of each package. With
some (hopefuly moderate) effort, minimal dsms could be build for every
remaining package.
--
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address: m.collado -> mcollado
- Raw text -