Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/09/11/06:30:12
Richard Dawe wrote:
> ...
> DSM files don't have to be in the legacy archives. pakke can install packages
> using DSMs stored somewhere other than in the package archives.
>
> One solution to this problem is to write DSMs for all the legacy packages and
> put them in a package, e.g.: djgpp-legacy-dsms. pakke actually comes with DSMs
> for some legacy packages.
One reason to compile a precise package list was to have the minimum
required information to automatically generating a minimalist dsm for
every distribution archive that lacks it.
>
> > I'm thinking about an interactive global installer/maintainer set on top
> > of pakke + wget + unzip32, capable of handling legacy archives.
>
> Laurynas Biveinis started an interactive installer. It's called KITE. Its
> source is distributed with pakke. You may want to talk to him about it. See
> the pakke home page for more details:
>
> http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/pakke/
I'll look at that.
>
> Why do you need unzip32 as well as pakke? pakke can unpack packages.
At least to install pakke ;-), isn't it? In addition, in Windows NT
machines perhaps it would be wise to install LFN support before
installing and using pakke for installing other packages.
>
> Let's talk some more about this. Regards,
OK,
--
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address: m.collado -> mcollado
- Raw text -