From:	"A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT c-o-r-n-e-l-l DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: mailing list posting policies?
Date:	10 Sep 2002 01:41:34 GMT
Organization:	Cornell University
Lines:	24
Sender:	asu1 AT cornell DOT invalid (on pool-141-149-207-72.syr.east.verizon.net)
Message-ID:	<Xns9284DCAA94EABasu1cornelledu@132.236.56.8>
References:	<200209080756 DOT g887u4K06321 AT delorie DOT com> <200209081558 DOT g88Fw2n24357 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D7B9AEA DOT EF16785F AT uol DOT com DOT br> <200209081908 DOT g88J8BN27262 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pool-141-149-207-72.syr.east.verizon.net
X-Trace:	news01.cit.cornell.edu 1031622094 14201 141.149.207.72 (10 Sep 2002 01:41:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news01 DOT cit DOT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Sep 2002 01:41:34 GMT
User-Agent:	Xnews/5.04.25
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote in news:200209081908.g88J8BN27262
@envy.delorie.com:

>> I believe any solution which can be done by (eventually additional)
>> automation is welcome but any decision which may require manual work
>> should be avoided as by now it seems to me the noise level in the
>> list/NG is low.
> 
> My own preferences would be one of these two:
> 
> 1. Let it be and just ignore the spam.

I think the current situation is not too bad. There is really very little 
spam that goes through (compared to the amount I get via email), and I can 
live with that. At this point, I don't think the extra work the alternative 
would impose on you, and the hassle for first time posters would be 
justified.

Sinan.
-- 
A. Sinan Unur
asu1 AT c-o-r-n-e-l-l DOT edu
Remove dashes for address
Spam bait: mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov

- Raw text -