Message-ID:	<001f01c25614$e8cd52a0$2ca0c6d4@noos.fr>
From:	"Julian Aubourg" <aubourg AT paris DOT ensmp DOT fr>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3d71a27d DOT 23705885 AT news DOT nzwide DOT ihug DOT co DOT nz> <mqb8nuoav2evvgeefdoj9r2gdfa0vqmk71 AT 4ax DOT com> <3d746b3c DOT 3046168 AT news DOT nzwide DOT ihug DOT co DOT nz> <Xns927E8AC415B4Craf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20> <3d795645$0$24320$79c14f64 AT nan-newsreader-02 DOT noos DOT net> <200209070134 DOT g871YGP03030 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: No new line at end of file?
Date:	Sat, 7 Sep 2002 04:18:48 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>   It also enables the undesirable and rarely used ISO trigraph
>   feature.

Is a newline at the end of the source desirable?
As I see it, one very important function of --ansi is to disable specific
gcc enhancements. Getting rid of the newline requirement sounds like an
enhancement to me. Furthermore, it ensures backward compatibility.
I suppose this is a decision beyond djgpp itself tho.

- Raw text -