From:	"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <rafal AT raf256 DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inline
Date:	29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT
Organization:	news.onet.pl
Lines:	23
Sender:	raf256 AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl@rafal.joint.eu.org
Message-ID:	<Xns927975D51B6A0raf256com@213.180.128.20>
References:	<Xns927961B9FE2B4raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20> <akkmrg$e7h$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <Xns927972F5EFEC9raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	rafal.joint.eu.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.onet.pl 1030613943 7050 62.233.182.179 (29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT onet DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT
User-Agent:	Xnews/5.03.24
X-Complains-To:	admin AT raf256 DOT com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <rafal AT raf256 DOT com> wrote in 
news:Xns927972F5EFEC9raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20

>> Inline requires the code to be in the header.  Right in the class
>> definition itself, actually, if memory serves:

btw. with notation is better (and why)

class cMonoBmp { [...] inline void PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1); };
void cMonoBmp::PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1) { [...] }

or

class cMonoBmp { [...] inline void PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1); };
inline void cMonoBmp::PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1) { [...] }
^^^^^^

I quess the second with both inline attributes ?


-- 
Rafał 'Raf256' Maj
http://www.raf256.com

- Raw text -