From:	Alex Pavloff <BLAHapavloff AT BLAHeason DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Text (console) UIs for C/C++ (Linux and DOS)
Message-ID:	<8r8bkuc1cpoetmiad0c2qit4j3m4qlc6mg@4ax.com>
References:	<ai2q1i$10pqss$1 AT ID-122086 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <pZc19.30286$eH2 DOT 12436140 AT ruti DOT visi DOT com> <ai3s30$10v94f$1 AT ID-122086 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <874reicull DOT fsf AT toncho DOT dhh DOT gt DOT org>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.9/32.560
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	14
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:23:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.204.139.80
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT sonic DOT net
X-Trace:	typhoon.sonic.net 1027974188 209.204.139.80 (Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:23:08 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:23:08 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:27:50 GMT, John Hasler <john AT dhh DOT gt DOT org> wrote:

>Philip Pemberton writes:
>> Anyone got a "No Legalese" copy of [the LGPL]?
>
>Such a thing cannot exist.  Re-writing it in "simpler" language would just
>be creating another similar license which might or might not have the same
>effect.  Just ask your lawyer to explain the LGPL to you.  That's what you
>would do with a commercial license you didn't understand, right? 

I've heard this "get a lawyer to explain it to you" from numerous
people, but how many of you got a lawyer to explain it to you in the
first place?  Really?  

- Raw text -