From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Still a few questions about relocating COFF symbols (dynamic loading)
Date:	24 Jul 2002 08:34:15 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<ahloq7$8ct$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<cd0304ab DOT 0207221344 DOT 2fb8967a AT posting DOT google DOT com> <3d3e11b2$0$1426$272ea4a1 AT news DOT execpc DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1027499655 8605 137.226.32.75 (24 Jul 2002 08:34:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	24 Jul 2002 08:34:15 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Chris Giese <NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com> wrote:
> dshnv AT www DOT com (dshnv) wrote:

> {some code}

>>int global_bss;

> If you use GNU C, non-initialized non-static non-extern globals are
> actually "common" variables. The linker allocates space for these,
> not the compiler.

> Turbo C, Microsoft C, etc. don't support common variables.

I'm almost sure they do.  This extension is very common, really.  It
may sail under a different name, though.


-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -