Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3D31AC05.B2CB7082@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:51:17 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
CC:	GNU fileutils <bug-fileutils AT gnu DOT org>,
	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: cp -if
References:	<20020628133023 DOT GB19395 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3D1ECBF0 DOT 2E1E3EB9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1026506590 DOT 787398 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <20020713132932 DOT GA18926 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

JT Williams wrote:
> 
> -: : "* cp's -f option no longer cancels the effect of --interactive (-i)
> -: : (per POSIX)"
> -:
> -: Ouch. So how do we override "-i"?
> 
> Ouch, indeed.  And why only cp?  mv -i can still be overridden.

I don't know why it's only cp. I had a quick look at draft 7 of the Austin
Group's work, which became part of the new POSIX standard. I can't see where
the behaviour of cp, mv is described. I've CC'd bug-fileutils. Hopefully
someone on that list can answer your question.

> I've reverted to fileutils 4.0.

Why? Is this change of behaviour really that bad?

BTW I'm no longer supporting the DJGPP port of fileutils 4.0. Since fileutils
4.1 is out, I will only release bugfixes for that.

Regards,

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -