From:	"deckerben" <deckerben AT freenet DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<200207131100 DOT g6DB0t409242 AT delorie DOT com> <1026566850 DOT 605764 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP packages of GNU units 1.80
Date:	Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:42:58 +0200
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<3d302dbb$0$23718$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	213.7.9.230
X-Trace:	1026567612 news.freenet.de 23718 213.7.9.230
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT freenet DOT de
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Martin Str|mberg" <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> wrote in message
news:1026566850 DOT 605764 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se...
> Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> wrote:

> y = 9/5*x + 32 (or some variation thereof) surely looks extremely
> linear to me.

Could it be that the term 'nonlinear' is being loosely applied here to
conversions requiring monomial/polynomial funcions as opposed to a simple
ratio of conversion?

Ben

- Raw text -