From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject:	Re: Those damn va_list errors
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<afd341$2pj$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl> <3d1a7b23 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <1025201969 DOT 276236 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3D1B70F2 DOT 52ED1749 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1025383681 DOT 113436 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3D1ECAAE DOT 37E88DB4 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent:	tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha))
Message-ID:	<1025439260.198847@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path:	queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date:	30 Jun 2002 12:14:20 GMT
Lines:	27
NNTP-Posting-Date:	30 Jun 2002 12:14:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace:	1025439260 news.luth.se 465 130.240.16.109
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
: How about big-packet pings? Try various sizes up to ~1520 (assuming
: clio.rice.edu is on an Ethernet).

nietzsche:~# ping -s 1000 clio.rice.edu
PING clio.rice.edu (128.42.105.3): 1000 data bytes
1008 bytes from 128.42.105.3: icmp_seq=0 ttl=223 time=211.7 ms
1008 bytes from 128.42.105.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=223 time=279.1 ms

--- clio.rice.edu ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 211.7/245.4/279.1 ms
nietzsche:~# ping -s 1520 clio.rice.edu
PING clio.rice.edu (128.42.105.3): 1520 data bytes

--- clio.rice.edu ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

: Is there a firewall between you and
: clio.rice.edu?

Not on my side (at the moment).


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -