From:	clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DOS Protected Mode Services under Windows XP
Date:	22 Jun 2002 22:22:44 GMT
Organization:	University of Virginia
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<af2tbk$h11$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
References:	<af26hh$bpd$1 AT murdoch DOT acc DOT Virginia DOT EDU> <1659-Sat22Jun2002201650+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cobra.cs.virginia.edu
X-Trace:	murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU 1024784564 17441 128.143.137.16 (22 Jun 2002 22:22:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT virginia DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	22 Jun 2002 22:22:44 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <1659-Sat22Jun2002201650+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
Eli Zaretskii <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> From: clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU
>> gcc 2.95.3 is
>> failing to compile a very large function in one of my C source files
>> (it will produce a few hundred KB of object code in a single
>> function.) The failure is silent; make shows that the compilation is
>> occurring, then it simply stops and does not continue any further in
>> the makefile, with no messages.
>
>I think that's because you have an old binary of GCC.  Be sure to get
>the latest one, there are numerous fixes for XP-specific problems.

I just figured out the rather simple problem: After installing the XP
fixed binary for gcc 2.95.3, I forgot to redo the stubedit for cc1.exe
in order to increase the stack space so it could handle such a large
compilation.

Clark Coleman

- Raw text -