From:	NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com (Chris Giese)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: GCC 3.1 and DJGPP - observations.
Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:53:29 GMT
Organization:	PROPULSION GROUP
References:	<3CFC9165 DOT 47E43C09 AT yahoo DOT com> <adi8rv$dtf$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<3cfd7d8b$0$3335$272ea4a1@news.execpc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	4fd20ec7.news.execpc.com
X-Trace:	DXC=oY4n8SH`bA;bB>U8iXFgW;bhiU1EQ[HI=0ICGTaT\Bl==EV;d7?Dn`=09LG=7MR7 AT 4d7jAeL2dO]06KLIaam[Jb7F]oQm9]^\A2
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT execpc DOT com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:

>CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
>
>> 3) All versions were compiled with O2.  Looking at the generated
>> code with "objdump -dS" it appears as if the optimization is quite
>> different.  
>
>It's supposed to be.  The new optimization engine is one of the major
>new features advertised for GCC-3.x.  It would have been rather
>un-interesting if it didn't effect the optimized code, wouldn't it?

Do you know if new GCC can use registers AH and AL at the same time?
For two 8-bit variables?

- Raw text -